I listened to a show on the radio last night about post-modern literature. I have to admit that I have no idea what post-modern literature is because I’m not that well educated nor do I know much about literature and its divisions. As it is, all I can tell you about literature is that Shakespeare wrote plays. Otherwise, I have no idea what’s been going on or which category a particular author falls into.
I looked up Post-modern literature on Wikipedia and they tell me that Douglas Copeland is a Post-modernist writer. It took me three years to read Douglas Copeland’s ‘Generation X’, and it was supposed to be about me. I don’t remember much of it, though.
I also read that Dave Eggers published ‘A heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius’ in 2000 but I still haven’t gotten around to reading it yet. Actually, until a short while ago I’d never heard of him.
It’s fair to say that I don’t pay much attention to what’s going on around me.
The radio program was a piece written by a post-modernist author whose name I can’t remember. My brain sieve has a gaping whole in it, I guess.
It seems that in the never ending journey of self-discovery, we, as a people, have mastered self-referential satire and assigned it a domain. I got worried for a minute, wondering if I had ever written any self-referential satire. I wondered, then, if it might be a bad thing. I wondered that if I ever accidentally write self-referential satire, must I call myself a post-modernist? I hope not. If so, I’d have to do some research on what it means and care, or something.
I copied this from Wikipedia, after searching for Post-modernism.
In a nutshell, the pro-postmodernism argument runs that economic and technological conditions of our age have given rise to a decentralized, media-dominated society in which ideas are simulacra and only inter-referential representations and copies of each other, with no real original, stable or objective source for communication and meaning. Globalization, brought on by innovations in communication, manufacturing and transportation, is often cited as one force which has driven the decentralized modern life, creating a culturally pluralistic and interconnected global society lacking any single dominant center of political power, communication, or intellectual production.
The thing I find interesting about this is that it’s only two sentences.
I got this one from the Wiki posting on Post-Modern literature.
Neo-Existential writers have also focused more on the post-modern end of Neo-Existentialism, creating stream of consciousness narratives that depict the confusion of post-modern, neo existential angst, as well as the bitter resignation to a blind, uncaring corporate world which alienates individuals from their own individual meaning so that rather than becoming to be "something" (the actualization of their potential), they become rather "nothing" (by the disvaluing and disregard of their potential they are never able to actualize themselves in society as productive members of a process directed towards an end), they become a mere tool to be used and dispensed with as needed.
That’s one sentence. I bet the same guy wrote both of these entries. He writes a long sentence, that guy.
Now, where was I going with this?
Oh, yeah. I like sitting through the trailers when I rent a movie so that when someone brings one up in a conversation I can pretend that I’ve seen it just by mentioning a scene or two. It’s not quite lying, and it’s better than having to watch all those movies. Am I a post-modernist or am I just lazy? And, in the end, does anyone, apart from the people who produce long winded and confusing radio documentaries, care one way or the other?
I feel like Gilligan when he discovered that the Skipper, the Professor and Ginger were kidnapped by aliens and replaced with body-doubles intent on wreaking havoc on the island. Luckily, Gilligan was just too stupid and the aliens gave up in frustration.